We have moved!

Commenting

Please visit our new blog at: http://blog.smartmoneytrackerpremium.com to read the latest posts and to comment.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

PORTFOLIO CHANGE

A portfolio change has been posted to the website.

205 comments:

  1. Gary,

    What are you talking about 09...Im talking about the D-wave that began 3/17/08.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gary,
    I thought that a month ago or so you mentioned that you would not buy GDXJ, or am I still sleepy?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The move in 08 was an eight year cycle low. We shouldn't see anything like that again until 2016.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mr. M,
    I think you're sleepy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Alright I'm off to run some errands.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Curious what percentage of their intended position or total PM portfolio everyone is invested at this point? Personally am in at about 70% right now, all leveraged ETFs, no options yet.

    ReplyDelete
  7. slw very strong today.. wonder why??

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dan, I have 10% of my total portfolio in GLD August calls (3 different strike prices).

    ReplyDelete
  9. over 10,000 contract in gold traded last 5 min.

    recognition point

    ReplyDelete
  10. I was watching that too, Gary. It will be very positive if the miners can turn upward after tagging their 10dma, especially if gold can complete a bull flag.

    I added a small DGP position this morning..8%, and will add again on a reversal off a correction in gold, or as market conditions allow other low risk opptys.

    Currently at
    18% GDX
    13% GDXJ
    8% DGP

    f

    ReplyDelete
  11. oa92000,
    Miners in general are doing good today.
    That being said, SLW has a tendency to wane in the second half of the day.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Geesh... did a rocket go off in the gold camp?

    ReplyDelete
  13. PS: as I've now discussed in the past I will continue to NOT play any miners. As a whole they continue to underperform a simple aggregate of 50/50 gold/silver. If (and UNTIL) that changes I will stick to 'straight metal'.

    Good luck, but I'm not going to hold gdx, gdxj, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ok, I was watching all morning and wanted more of a pullback and then the big pop just now. I couldn't take it anymore so bought DGP from the miners I should yesterday. Ok I made the sacrifice so now we can finally get our pullback :)

    ReplyDelete
  15. 14% GDX call options.
    14% DGP.
    both in the green, but nervous about GDX, and will run a tight stop on it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Gary,
    Just increased my positions as follows:
    GDX +50%
    GDXJ +100%
    GLD +40%

    Good luck to all.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wallofworrry,

    Pretty aggressive, 190% of your portfolio?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Gold is stretched above the 10sma, Chase or not to chase?

    ReplyDelete
  19. "Fed Minutes Show Policy Makers Discussed Possibility of Third Round of Stimulus"

    Wham bam thank you ma'am.

    Let the chasing begin.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Dan,

    He could be talking relative to his previous positions. He technically could still be overall only 2% invested, lol.

    ReplyDelete
  21. FUBSY, Ryan: I had GLD so added 5% to
    start DGP today. Hope not to Have "POP and DROP"! :)

    ReplyDelete
  22. Thnx Poly, quick.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Gary said about some dollar reversal. Did I miss sth?

    ReplyDelete
  24. YOU NAILED IT GARY! CONGRATS!

    ReplyDelete
  25. should i wait til end of day or buy my increase now?

    ReplyDelete
  26. A generational bull market in its 11th year, which just confirmed a new IT cycle with no doubt, on the eve of a massive sovereign debt crises.

    Mmmmmm, should i buy?

    ReplyDelete
  27. IES,

    Your right, thought about that right after I hit the publish button.

    Poly, great find.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Wow, miners are taking off. Great call Gary. Still early but looks like you may have nailed this one.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Gary,

    My faith in your cycle analysis helped me hold on to my positions yesterday. Added SLW this morning. Comfortable with what I have now.

    You are simply great!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Gary - Awesome call on the intermediate low on Gold. Took guts, and look at her now. Nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  31. and how many weeks left do we have for the IT cycle to run?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Why did the market turn upwards along with metals?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Just added a little more. Looks like QE3 is happening afterall. I think were gonna keep rallying into the close after this news.

    ReplyDelete
  34. 120% GDXJ as of this early morning

    ReplyDelete
  35. traderlady,
    I was 40% a couple of days ago with GLD and miners but I kind of freaked yesterday so I sold my miners. I bought back in DGP from my miners so now in 36%. I would really like to go back to 100% and just old turkey but I have a feeling for me to get to 100% I'm going to have to chase it.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Call option ownership could pay off well here if you get the price direction half right - GVZ CBOE gold volatility levels at just 17, move into 20s easy on breakout, possibly into 30s toward blow-off phase.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Went long two gold contracts about an hour before the spike. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

    ReplyDelete
  38. So where`s the first pause, outer space and then on from there?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Gary,

    When do you plan on adding now...lol??

    ReplyDelete
  40. do i wait for some weakness before initiating the rest of my position (about 35% left)??

    or just go all in, and wait for gary's top call??

    ReplyDelete
  41. Dan,
    Like IES said, relative to my position.
    Doubled # of shares of GDXJ, increased shares of GDX from 100 to 150, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  42. RYAN, I have been going in close to FUBSY except I also had GLD. Now, DGP.
    I shall add at 10MA, gaps, bull flags and other opportunities. I feel more comfortable that way. I like to sleep:)

    ReplyDelete
  43. If the miners can break through May 31 highs then it's free air...

    ReplyDelete
  44. I decided to wait till market close, but after such a rally I don't know if adding to positions will be a good idea. Gold is extremely stretched above 10DMA. Do you think that any pullback on gold will push down miners or they just did their duty (tagged 10DMA) and ignore that pullback?

    ReplyDelete
  45. My juniors are doing well, Minco Gold, Kaminak Gold, Augusta Resource

    ReplyDelete
  46. Glad I bought some GDX calls yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Im going to be patient here and not add, gold is way to stretched above the 10sma, and I dont like when gold rallies on news like a possible QE3

    ReplyDelete
  48. William "today I am" Wallace,
    I agree to some of that thought. The markets pooped on "any good news" but are now thinking "what the f?".

    We shall see.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Ugh... I meant to write "popped"...

    ReplyDelete
  50. LOL can't blame that one on autocorrect.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Gary wasn't running errands, he was hitting the "buy" button.

    Alex good charts on EXK AG and GPL

    ReplyDelete
  52. I guess now we know why markets turned on a dime with no main levels today (equities, crude, Euro etc). Someone must have leaked the Feds agenda or notes and caused the huge turnaround - the smart money obviously got wind and bid up risk assets. So much for efficient and regulated markets!!

    ReplyDelete
  53. Mr M,

    lolll...no you meant poop, thats what emotions do to most traders when there is news like QE3!

    ReplyDelete
  54. The minutes from the last Fed meeting were published and QE3 was discussed as a possibility at that last meeting.

    I think the markets and most of us to here realize that these idiots will continue to make the same mistake over and over and over.

    They can't seem to get it through their heads that it's not the dose that's the problem it's the medicine.

    ReplyDelete
  55. 86,

    The first pause was the bathroom, ask Mr, M...loll

    ReplyDelete
  56. "james r said...
    120% GDXJ as of this early morning"

    keep it simple..

    ReplyDelete
  57. Allright.. glad it made y'all smile.

    Now I got to haul 30 panels of drywall to the basement.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Mr M,

    get the lighter drywall, not as heavy

    ReplyDelete
  59. Hi Gary,

    If Gold or GDX reverses most of the "QE3 move" before close, are you still going to add today ?

    ReplyDelete
  60. Well I added right at GLD $153 today which is why things have cooled off in the last few minutes.... ; )

    But seriously, I am going to go all-in when GLD touches its 10 DMA.

    I've decided to stick to GLD and only GLD but use margin from my broker (IB has a really cheap margin rate).

    For me to lose money the yellow metal has to go down, period, end of story. Trying to keep it simple.

    ReplyDelete
  61. William "who am I today",
    They are 90% 1/2" 12x4 panels.
    75lbs each, Gary, you have competition. Except I do it in 30 trips...

    ReplyDelete
  62. Hi Gary and others,

    Looking for entry on spotgold, all of you seem to invest in etf's, when would you advise to buy. At tag of 10MA and when swing confirmed another buy? or is this bull just gonna run wild for now??

    ReplyDelete
  63. jhnewman

    I hope you are still with us and I hope you are still holding strong to your positions (and I suspect you are). Congratulations on your call so far. You got a great entry back in May and were staunch and held strong when most said gold was falling.


    Matty

    I believe you owe jh an apology............

    ReplyDelete
  64. If you don't have any position I'd for sure establish something. Bull markets do surprise to the upside.

    It's anybody's guess what tomorrow brings.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Nice volumes

    http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/3/gld120720115min.jpg/

    ReplyDelete
  66. I for sure would like take a position now, but contracts are a bit big and hard to get a nice entry atm as i see it??

    ReplyDelete
  67. where would you put your stops?

    ReplyDelete
  68. Gary, are you adding to model porfolio today?

    ReplyDelete
  69. Silverhound, what's the secret to being able to watch US market from Australia i.e. all night?

    ReplyDelete
  70. grim, do you have any opinion on the USD/JPY closing at 83 by yearend 2011? EUR/USD between 1.43 and no weaker than 1.50?

    I am trying to wrap my head around the U.S. dollar and thus the currencies. The article I was reading on Bloomberg left me almost completely conused. The USD/JPY seems to me to be the clear-cut play. Clear as mud?

    They seem to be saying that the Japanese economy will continue to suffer as they recover from the earthquake damage. I am just guessing though. The only other thing I can think of is a recession in China afecting the Yen as the East's dominate currency.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-11/best-currency-forecasters-say-worst-is-over-for-dollar-after-index-tumbles.html

    ReplyDelete
  71. Slick Willy,
    You really are a Heathen, man. LOL.

    Mr M,
    I spent 6 mo. on a project once where all the rock was 5/8 12`, 122 lbs. a sheet. Some 14` too. Nice stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Gary,

    I don't remember what your philosophy for the model portfolio is. Will you always keep some percentage in cash?

    ReplyDelete
  73. Silverman, He plans to keep 25% in cash
    so plan accordingly:)

    ReplyDelete
  74. Michael

    No secret, 6 hours sleep every 24hours whenever you can fit it in

    and no day job :-)

    I just seem to wake up in the wee hours so I watch the markets.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Silverhound:

    THANKS for the nice note.

    Actually, I've been whipsawed a bit over the last 3 weeks.

    The big "oil drop" in gold following the last Fed meeting knocked me out of my long positions. I got out on a bounce about 3 days later. That long trade I held for so long netted me only about +.5% for my portfolio.

    Then, since it looked like we had a failed daily cycle (left-translated) and about another 2 weeks of drop ahead of us, I flipped my whole portfolio into ZSL. Had one day of glory, and then, early last week, it went against me and I got out. -5% to portfolio.

    Then I flipped everything long, and am now "all in" with a lot of leverage in EXK, AG & NG, and am very close to making back that -5% already.

    I'm forced to take chances on my trading because I'm using the money to fund the documentary I'm making -- and it's a money pit. Otherwise, I wouldn't be "as extreme" in my approach.

    I plan to hold these longs for the coming Intermediate Cycle ride, probably selling a portion at possible daily cycle tops *later in the Intermediate Cycle*, with hopes of buying them back cheaper at the daily cycle low.

    Best of luck to you and everyone else here.

    Gotta run!

    ReplyDelete
  76. By the way, Gary, GREAT CALL on the IC low!

    ReplyDelete
  77. Ireland downgrade killing momentum

    ReplyDelete
  78. Gary,

    Since you arent adding to gld would you still expect a pullback..maybe a bounce off the previous high..before adding to that?

    ReplyDelete
  79. Nice story, JHNewman . . . thanks for sharing it (and thanks for inviting it, Silverhound.)

    What's your documentary about -- can you say?

    ReplyDelete
  80. Vonda--

    We "reporter types" guard our story ideas like a junkyard dog standing over his last bone.

    But just to characterize it: it's 2 adventure stories linked together, one taking place in Scotland, the other in India. And both of the stories have "a spiritual significance".

    If all works out as planned, it will end up in movie theaters, next year or even the year after.

    ReplyDelete
  81. JH, Can't think of a better place to funnel PM profits! Excellent!!

    ReplyDelete
  82. Added to my GDX position and DGP....

    ReplyDelete
  83. jh

    I suspect were it not for your money pit you'd have held. We all have to roll with the punches but thats trading hey. Stick with it.

    G'day Vonda, hope you are well.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Hey TZ! Where you been? I was worried about you (seriously...I just posted a few days ago asking if anyone knew what was up with you). Glad to have you back.

    All: I have been out all day and unable to post. GLD seems stretched to me. I have a good slug (DGP) so can wait now. Bought more DGP this morning at 49.76. DBC showed up on my sell screen (GLD will on one more sharp up day) so I shorted it figuring it's a decent hedge against my DGP. Then DGP rallied and DBC dropped a little. Nice luck! I am unlikely to buy miners this run, but you can get 4 X leverage just with DGP so that's more than enough for me. I expect a dip in GLD this week.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Top of the morn' (Middle of the night) to you, Silvherhound,

    Very well, thanks.
    Good to see you 'round!
    Hope all is well on your end of the world too.

    Wish I had something PM relevant to say: Am long a bucket list of goldish type vehicles and feeling very queasy about the whole thing, so I guess that's about right, eh?

    (And I just couldn't resist a small position in that old monster, AGQ. Small.)

    ReplyDelete
  86. I'm 40% invested with a little leverage via DGP. My plan is to go to 60% invested on a tag and reversal off of the 10dma or thereabouts in Gold. I believe a corrective move is imminent. Whether it occurs before or after gold becomes rt translated remains to be seen, and will be interesting to watch. I'm hoping it comes sooner rather than later to keep sentiment mild.

    At that point I'll be 33% into DGP so there will be a good amount of leverage.

    At the next DCL, I'll add the rest. My allocation between miners and metal will depend on their relative performance during the duration of this daily cycle.

    f

    ReplyDelete
  87. Vonda, Im with you on silver. Im long Spet. calls, in addition to my gold. Silver may not make new highs, but low to mid 40s would be more than enough, and very possible if gold does 'blow off'.
    April, Silver was leading, with gold following, now the roles are reversed.

    ReplyDelete
  88. lol Vonda

    The sun has peeked over the horizon and the smell of my favourite, fresh ground Barcelona three bean espresso blend has filled the kitchen so I'll gladly accept your mornin' salutation.

    This PM game is easy hey ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  89. We are indeed stretched, finally. If I had to guess, judging by the amount of sudden believers (capitulation) in gold today that we will get our half cycle low move right here or at an attempt tomorrow to take at that all time high.
    The capitulation (or panic buy) points normally marks a reversal, temporary in this case. So as long as you don't whipsaw yourself on any temporary weakness, it will be roaring to $1,600 before this daily is out.

    Nothing like a stealth $90 rally to get the interest of those speculative longs.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Currently 90% miners now. Will go 100-130% on a pullback in gold/miners to 10DMA/previous support/QE3/4/5.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Ooh that smells good, Silverhound.

    Just finished off a pot of Sulawesi myself . . . It seems traders/investors cycles start to mesh, despite geographical differences?

    Thanks Aaron for the silver-nod and to know I'm not alone. I welcome hitting the low 40's mark!

    Ugh. Yeah, easy-peasy.

    I've got my own money pit. "It's" twelve years old and staring me down for a handball match.
    Best put on my trainers and gulp a final swallow of caffeine!

    ReplyDelete
  92. Gold did an amazing job of putting ugly candles on the chart, wandering around like a drunken sailor for the last two months, defying the dollar, and diverting from miners to get to this point.

    Standing ovation for the gold bull on this one. Perfectly executed no matter what happens next few days.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Hi everybody ,

    i am currently on my phone as I am travelling.
    Could anybody tell me when is thé 10dma sitting at the moment? Thanks! and great call Gary

    ReplyDelete
  94. Knowing most of you are trading only gold and silver. What are your thoughts about sp500.. am sitting on quite a big short pos which is coming down to breakeven. My system is still in sell (though not a 100 percent), but would like to hear your thought.. are we gonna se a higher high before going further down?

    ReplyDelete
  95. Poly

    So you wouldn't chase here right?
    We are getting in timing band for a half cycle low.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Perhaps it's already been mentioned but GDX has pulled back from the 200 day MA today. GDX closed $57.37; 200day $57.646

    ReplyDelete
  97. Haggerty,

    I avoid having to ask myself that question by buying that first foundation stake immediately, see smoke in the timing band, you buy.

    If you don't have a stake, buy it now no matter what. Who care if or when we do fall back to the 10dma, be happy and buy your 2nd lot.
    No money made watching a bull market, you got to run with them.

    ReplyDelete
  98. The danger is not in buying right now, but chasing in a few days if it goes higher and losing your position when it backtests, only to have it take off from there. Get a small position to start getting strong hand status, because if we are less than 10 days into a 20-25 week cycle, your risk is small but getting bigger by the day. Worst case scenario we stop out at Gary's stops, but that is starting to get further away by the day. This train leaves fast.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Intermediate cycles last 20-25 weeks...old turkey until October/November for me :)

    ReplyDelete
  100. ND: I covered my shorts a week ago. It is extremely dangerous to short so soon after historically high levels of bearishness. Many studies from June pointed to 1-3 month long rallies.

    For example: (from sentimentrader.com)

    Active Studies:
    06/22: A 90% up volume day off a low
    Positive
    06/20: Cluster of 90% down volume days Positive
    06/17: Put/call > 1.0 for 2 straight days Positive
    06/16: VIX crosses 20% first time in 50 days Positive
    06/10: Stocks drop but VIX doesn't
    Positive
    06/09: AAII bulls low while stocks high
    Positive
    06/01: Consumer confidence low, stocks high Positive
    05/19: Newsletter bulls drop, market rises Positive
    05/11: A new all-time high in breadth
    Positive
    03/31: Rapid whipsaw in 10-day Up Issues Positive

    You won't find me shorting for more than a trade in the face of all that!

    ReplyDelete
  101. DG,
    You mentioned you can get 4X leverage with DGP. Do you mean 2X or you mean going on margin and buying DGP therefore increasing your leverage?

    ReplyDelete
  102. Silverhound,

    As with all market traders, I must remain humble and recognize when credit is due.

    Jhnewman,

    If I offended, I do apologize. I am also sorry to hear about your recent whipsaw action but it sounds like you a poised for a rebound. My daughter is a documentary filmmaker as well. Good luck with the project!

    ReplyDelete
  103. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  104. "Intermediate cycles last 20-25 weeks...old turkey until October/November for me :)"

    Yes!

    I've found that the IT cycle technically tops at around week 12-15. Any further gains or nominal new high's are typically just marginal and choppy/volatile.

    Meaning the meat and relatively risk-less gains are in weeks 1-12, the scavengers fight over the carcass in weeks 16-24.

    ReplyDelete
  105. DG

    I actually shorted the markets before the extreme bearish sentiment, then got into another 2nd and 3 pos on the rebound up, only to find that the rebound was way stronger than i'd ever expect. took me by storm..
    got SL at 1360 atm, still don't think we should go higher but like gary mentioned earlier; fighting the big guys is dangerous.. so sitting here wondering if it's time to get out while losses are at minimum or stay with original strategy and hope that we don't se 1360 reached.. thanks for sentiment stuff!

    ReplyDelete
  106. Gary,
    I didn't get a tweet about this. Just read it on the blog now.

    ReplyDelete
  107. DG - my systems are based on more classic TA´s rather than cycles, but been subscribing to SMT now and thinki'm starting to get an idea about it.. my other dilemma is to get some sort of entry in spotgold...though i really don't like buying on strength..hmm

    ReplyDelete
  108. Ryan: I meant that in a $25,000 account you can buy $50,000 of DGP which is like buying $100,000 of gold itself. If gold rallies 25% your account doubles.

    ReplyDelete
  109. DG,
    Gotcha, I'm plenty happy with 2X. Here's hoping if we do get that pullback it'll be fast and furious and I'll gauge it, if my hands tremble, I'll click buy!

    ReplyDelete
  110. Matt--

    THANK YOU for the very gracious apology.

    But, to tell you the truth, I don't know what you're apologizing for. I drop in to "Gary's" when I can, but miss many, many comments. So I never saw your remarks.

    Don't worry about it. We're all in this together, and all trying to figure out how to best trade this PM bull.

    On my trading: I've made back all of my ZSL portfolio loss and then some with today's action. So I'm good to go again, leveraged big long for this Intermediate Cycle.

    And on my recent trades, I've learned some valuable lessons, such as: when the situation is murky, trade in legs. I had very nice profits on my DGP/NUGT twice, and let them slip away, because I was holding for a longer, higher swing-trade. I won't make that mistake twice.

    The best of luck to you and your daughter.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Life is good for former Santa Clara police chief Steve Lodge -- or specifically, public life has been good to Lodge.

    This is a follow up discussion from this weekend about police pensions out of control.

    After 30 years on the force, at age 52 he collects a $200,000 annual pension, and is set to cash in even more as chief of security at the new 49ers stadium, where he'll collect $100 an hour on the public dime, according to the San Jose Mercury News.

    The arrangement is fishy to some -- especially opponents of the stadium plan -- because Lodge was a vocal supporter of the stadium plan that voters approved last year, without which he wouldn't be able to "double-dip": collect a hefty pension while returning to work for the city.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Sorry my comment was after the first paragraph.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Hi Gary,

    It would have been helpful to get a tweet on the portfolio change today.

    Best,
    Le Fou

    ReplyDelete
  114. Can someone here explain to Mr Miyagi's Canadian brain what this debt ceiling vote thingy is about?
    hat results are expected and what would that entail to markets and commodities.

    Also, markets did poop after popping today so I guess my keyboard had a premonition.

    ReplyDelete
  115. hat results? Oh man!

    What results...What..

    ReplyDelete
  116. I think twitter is down. I just had my webmaster check and the site is still set to automatically tweet whenever a post is made.

    ReplyDelete
  117. GDX has the 100 & 200 DMA at the same spot today, is this of any significance? Once you break through, it will be both and there's nothing above it.

    ReplyDelete
  118. Not sure if this was said but stockcharts.com has OHLC charts back up for Gold and Dollar. Not sure if this is permanent though.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Gary,

    Stockcharts.com is back to using the old charting method for $GOLD and $USD

    ReplyDelete
  120. Brian,
    Thanks for the info, the daily candelsticks are back.

    ReplyDelete
  121. DG & Poly - thanks for all your posts, invaluable augmentations of G's analysis, esp. at critical moments. And the helpful posts of so many more.

    I'm going DG's route so far for this move.

    ReplyDelete
  122. Any input to my 2 questions a bit above here?

    ReplyDelete
  123. In other news, Netflix is raising their rates.... 60%.

    Gary, don't you get any ideas now...

    ReplyDelete
  124. NUGT vs. DGP - PM shares outperforming gold since the bottom, as they have been since the start of this bull market. If one is looking for leverage, it may still be best to atleast by some PM share ETFs along with DGP.

    ReplyDelete
  125. Wow, beautiful day in gold:) My weekly system went to a buy today and excluding 2008 it is 100% winners since 2001. The pivot system also went to a buy, and I'm still on the hunt to add more:( Will we ever have a down day, LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  126. So what is the upside target of this c-wave move up in gold?

    ReplyDelete
  127. I got a tweet at the portfolio change today but have had a few times where it was late. Today, however, was on time.

    ReplyDelete
  128. Mr M

    And they say there's no inflation. I was at the store and saw a 1.5 liter soda bottle for .99. I guess the 2 liter bottles will be going away. It won't be long before the milk containers start shrinking...

    ReplyDelete
  129. Gary:

    Thanks for the addition of the last % in the portfolio in GLD.

    Quick question: In the past you have mentioned that Big money drives prices above or below a key level before reversing. What are the odds that such a scenario will play out in Gold, especially given the $$$ RT cycle?

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  130. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  131. gary
    how come you hardly ever mention your thoughts on crude oil in your nightly reports . just was wondering? my take is you dont feel its worth mentioning . jake

    ReplyDelete
  132. An interesting note on the weekly buy; the last 5 signals(winning trades) have corrected $45,40,40 10,13 from the buy point with the $13 being the latest long trade from earlier this year.So we can probably expect at least a correction down to 1550 where I will be adding at.

    ReplyDelete
  133. Thanks Veronica - always like to see what your systems doing. Nice of you to share it also.

    ReplyDelete
  134. Gary,

    couldn't reply any earlier, but want to add something in regards to 'silver at $21' exchange from yesterday...

    The second chart at this link...

    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article28668.html

    ...shows the corrections in silver from 2002 to 2011.

    I don't see the type of parabola that you're seeing. What I do see is that what occurred in April/May 2011 seems to be normal action, the type that happens practically every other year.
    There seems to be nothing implying that silver could or should go to $21. On the contrary, if silver will be doing what it's done before and what I am counting on, it should crawl back up to between $40 and $50, then bounce around, and then go much, much higher. Also, I don't see why silver should be doing 2, 3 years of 'nothing'.

    ReplyDelete
  135. Jake,
    I traded energy during the last bull market. I knew it wasn't going to do much during this bull market. The has-beens never do.

    The only reason I even watch oil is because it is a big part of the CRB and I'm tracking the move down into the three-year cycle low.

    ReplyDelete
  136. As for your cycles, I thought you were expecting a D wave? If what we just had wasn't the D wave that you expected, then when would you expect it to take place now, and where do you see it take gold and silver?

    In terms of manipulation in the market, I don't see why there should be manipulation in one market and not in another. I agree that precious metals are a market of much less importance, but precious metals can also be manipulated more easily. Isn't the plunge protection team just another urban legend?

    In any case, I don't think moves in the markets, which you or anyone else didn't expect, should be explained by a manipulation story, one way or another.

    ReplyDelete
  137. Basil,
    Nothing that has come before was even close to what just happened in silver.

    From the bottom of the D wave in 08 to the top silver gained over 500%. No other run gained much more than 100%.

    What we saw in silver this past year was like a four Sigma event. This was similar to the final run in oil.

    The only thing that kept silver from completing the parabolic collapse was the fact that gold entered a consolidation instead of a more normal intermediate decline.

    There will be big money to be had in silver puts once this intermediate cycle tops.

    That parabolic collapse is not finished.

    ReplyDelete
  138. Gary,

    if there is a recession in 2012 and with it another leg down in the secular bear, you do expect precious metals to still be the front runner in the next cyclical bull, even though they were the front runners in this cyclical bull just energy was the leader in the last cyclical bull and is no longer today?

    ReplyDelete
  139. Basil,
    The Fed threw $76 billion at the market in that final week of June.

    Bernanke has clearly stated his intentions to inflate the stock market. I'm going to take him at his word.

    I'll say this again, D-wave is a severe regression to the mean profit-taking event. In order for that to happen gold has to stretch far above the 200 day moving average.

    You can't get a D wave without first getting an extreme stretch. We just have not had that yet. Until we do I suspect we will just continue to see these mild intermediate corrections. But eventually sentiment will become wildly bullish and buyers will push gold to extremes and that will trigger a true D-wave decline.

    ReplyDelete
  140. Whether or not precious metals continue to lead will depend on the fundamentals of the next bull market. If the next bull is driven by another massive debasement of the currency, then yes precious metals will lead again.

    ReplyDelete
  141. Heck, I'll just repost my 2 questions.
    I will cry all night if no one cares...

    Can someone here explain to Mr Miyagi's Canadian brain what this debt ceiling vote thingy is about?
    What results are expected and what would that entail to markets and commodities.

    GDX has the 100 & 200 DMA at the same spot today, is this of any significance? Once you break through, it will be both and there's nothing above it.

    ReplyDelete
  142. MrMiyagi, as far as I am aware, if the debt ceiling is raised the US dollar will strengthen. Don't know by how much or for how long though. If the debt ceiling is not raised and the US Government defaults on its debt obligations I imagine things will get turbulent in the stock market pretty pronto

    ReplyDelete
  143. Ignore the debt ceiling show. It's nothing more than political grandstanding. Everyone knows a deal will be made, the debt ceiling will be raised, and Ben's printing press will get back to work.

    It's irrelevant to commodities although it may spark a rally in stocks. Especially if we get another move down that looks like a true intermediate bottom in that expected early August time frame.

    ReplyDelete
  144. OK, that explains it a bit, thanks to both of you.
    Gary, you don't think it might affect gold prices?

    ReplyDelete
  145. R41,you're welcome.I do have to say I keep posting here because it seems to make my trading better,so maybe it's for selfish reasons:)I hope my signals are helping/confirming traders convictions with Gary's calls.

    ReplyDelete
  146. Gary,

    I don't post that often but I have to compliment you on your latest call on gold - it was great.

    A question - if the S&P does begin a significant correction why won't it significantly affect the miner's ascent?

    I know the miner's didn't participate that much in the last intermediate cycle so they could lead the metal on this cycle but there still has to be a correlation between the S&P and the miner's.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Gary,

    Thanks for your posting. I've really got a lot from it. I'm a relative newcomer, still learning, and still own a substantial amount of silver (that I bought around $17). Would now be a good time to sell or do you expect it to go up in the next couple of months (even a few dollars would be nice)?

    You talk of it as a broken a parabola, is it best to divest yourself of it as soon as possible?

    Thanks,

    Mike

    ReplyDelete
  148. Rob L - the miners have a very low beta, and often a negative beta (they go up when the market goes down) for a period of years. The GDX beta for the last 3 years is only 0.28, and the r2 is 0, which means the market has not had anything to do with fluctuations in the ETF.

    I'm 130% in NUGT, which is 2X the gold miners index, so 260% exposed. NUGT up 6.2% today. Will hold until Gary calls a top.

    ReplyDelete
  149. Putting in market order for 50% today on GDXJ and NUGT....does it concern anyone that Gold is right near it's top and Miners are not even close to the top?

    ReplyDelete
  150. From http://bit.ly/rlgsVz
    Steve Sjuggerud quoting Jason Goepfert:

    Right now – right this moment – is an incredibly good time to buy gold. It's the best time to buy since late 2008.

    Investors are more apathetic about gold than they've been in years (based on excellent research by my friend Jason Goepfert of SentimenTrader).

    Jason's proprietary measure of investor sentiment about gold is now at its lowest levels since November 2008. (That's good. You want to buy when investor sentiment is bad – that's when your upside potential is the biggest.)

    The last time gold sentiment was this low, gold soared nearly $500 an ounce in one year. It's true... Gold bottomed in November 2008 near $700 an ounce. One year later, it nearly hit $1,200 an ounce.

    I was surprised to hear Jason report that investors are so apathetic about gold today... particularly since gold hasn't fallen all that much in the last two months.

    Jason explains why he thinks this happened: "Sometimes when a market has been strong for a long time, people are so afraid that every little hiccup is the bursting of a bubble that they become very pessimistic very quickly... The metal has held up very well, yet many of the measures we track are at or near two-year lows in optimism."

    I think this is a bullish sign for gold. The price of gold has held up very well as investors have given up a bit on it. So... gold is in a clear uptrend... yet investors are apathetic. This is what I like to see!

    ReplyDelete
  151. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  152. Gary,

    Looking to see if I'm on the same page.

    Are you expecting this gold intermediate cycle to be right translated? Bottoming around the end of the year?

    Then followed possibly by a left translated intermediate cycle creating a regression to the mean(if necessary) that may bottom around June 2012? Or do left translated IT cycles come only during the 8 year cycle low?

    I'm trying to find my cycles hat but am afraid I still have much to learn.

    Thanks.....

    ReplyDelete
  153. Here's a chart if it helps explain.

    http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$GOLD&p=D&yr=1&mn=8&dy=8&id=p33232685548&listNum=1&a=239208502

    By the way is there an easier/better way to post a chart?

    ReplyDelete
  154. Rob L,
    I think it is a mistake believe that the miners have to be correlated with the S&P. Miners sell gold. Their profit margins increase as the price of gold increases. If gold is rising in the stock of miners becomes more valuable.

    ReplyDelete
  155. gary

    gold is gapping up... any suggestion to those who have yet to add their final positions to gold?

    not

    ReplyDelete
  156. @Farm Girl I think what makes that sentiment reading even more compelling is the overall lack of participation in this pm secular bull. Low sentiment and low participation in a secular bull market = more (and big) gains probably still ahead. Until the gold/DJIA ratio approaches 1:1 I will remain long the pm's.

    ReplyDelete
  157. Not,
    I did my best to get everybody in at the lowest risk entry where the stops were reasonably close.

    I suggested several times that if you weren't going to take that entry to make a plan for when you would enter.

    I suggest you follow your plan.

    ReplyDelete
  158. GLD short-term gains are taxed at 50%, as I recall.

    Is there any other better ETF in terms of tax implications?

    ReplyDelete
  159. DG,
    Unless I'm mistaken GLD will be taxed, short term, at whatever your earned income rate is.

    Long-term rates are taxed as a collectible at 28%.

    ReplyDelete
  160. Here it says GLD is taxed at 35% for short term

    http://www.twenty-first.com/pdf/Investment_News/2011/complexity_of_etf_options_IN_jun19_2011.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  161. Gary,
    It strikes me as odd that while in your daily comments you acknowledge that the Fed/Govt/Banks are rigging the stock market to the point of it being ridiculous, you would -still, I presume- find it normal and no sign of rigging whatsoever by the Fed/Govt/Banks that when gold breaks out of its all-time high by almost 2 dollar, it then gets bombed back below that high literally the next minute. Come on, this is not how $2 breakouts would normally play out in a free market!
    (Yeah, I know about false breakouts - but not like this one. If this isn't just as ridiculous as the stocks being rigged, than what would be?)
    Regardless, the bombing will not succeed in keeping gold below 1577.

    ReplyDelete
  162. Thanks Gary for a big weeks profits. Everyone always told me you were a master of spotting a bottom.

    ReplyDelete
  163. Walter,
    That's just normal market behavior. Traders that rode this all the way from 1477 will naturally take profits on any move to new highs.

    Just because you want a move to new highs to hold and it doesn't isn't a sign of manipulation. The simple fact is that most breakouts initially fail as profit takers sell into the breakout.

    Usually it takes more than one attempt for a breakout to succeed.

    ReplyDelete
  164. Thanks Gary, you are right:

    http://www.thestreet.com/story/10629047/1/your-gold-etf-could-bring-a-hefty-tax-bill.html

    ReplyDelete
  165. How about GLD or DGP in an ira? Hopefully no implications!

    ReplyDelete
  166. Gary,

    > That's just normal market behavior.
    > Traders that rode this all the way from 1477 will
    > naturally take profits on any move to new highs.

    Sure, and they would do so +all+ of them together at +exactly+ one minute after the breakout, wouldn't they.

    My main point, though, was not that this bombing was or was not conclusive proof, but that I find it odd how you can maintain that the stocks are rigged and gold is not. So, again: if stocks are being rigged, why would any other market NOT be rigged, if the Fed/Govt/Banks would consider it to fit their purposes to do so?

    ReplyDelete
  167. Walter,
    it is a very small percentage of the people out there who actually follow the gold spot price, whereas the S&P500, DJ index or your local index etc. gets broadcasted out all the time on the news. If this were to tank hard it is apparent that all is not well with the world (who knew?) but so long as the stock indices are still propped up the mirage is still there.

    The problem for all of us who follow gold and other PM's are myopia; I cannot understand that so few actually see what is happening in front of their eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  168. okay I'll ask the question again. The one that nobody seems to be able to answer.

    What possible reason does the government or the Fed have for trying to manipulate the price of gold? Why would they throw away billions and billions of dollars trying to hold back a secular bull market?

    The simple fact is gold is just doing what bull markets do.

    How anyone, after seeing that run in silver, can with a straight face,will still claim manipulation is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  169. "The problem for all of us who follow gold and other PM's are myopia; I cannot understand that so few actually see what is happening in front of their eyes."

    Got interrupted,
    what I meant was that this is the reason why gold (most likely) isn't manipulated, because very few actually follow the gold spot price development at this stage. Even fewer connects the dots as to why it is at all time high, I can tell you.

    ReplyDelete
  170. Gary-
    17 days into the SPX cycle, is that too early to expect a mid-cycle low? Seems they usually come around in the 20-25 day range.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  171. Gary, I don't know if there's manipulation on the part of the government, but how can you look at the silver collapse that took place on the back of 5 consecutive margin increases in the span of a week and not think something's fishy? Personally I don't believe it was a conspiracy, it was just profit motive. Take huge short positions and then crush the price at a spot where everyone expected huge resistance. No shadowy government conspiracy necessary.

    You can say the parabola would have collapsed anyway, and it probably would have at some point, but without the intervention by the CME I think you would have been right and it would have pushed through 50.

    ReplyDelete
  172. Excellent observation on manipulation:

    "Most commodities are not cheaply storable over long periods, so actors get forced into the few that do: gold, silver, etc. There is a problem here, stemming from dumb money. When dumb money shows up for purchase of generic “commodities” distortions follow: backwardation, large storage demand, and warped market incentives.

    Eventually overproduction catches up, but the volatility when it breaks can be huge and self-reinforcing, with c0unterparties raising margin to protect themselves. Extreme volatility causes exchanges to raise margin requirements substantially, which reveals which side of the trade is inadequately financed, which typically is the side that was winning, which leads to a reversal in price action. The dumb money is revealed.

    Now after a washout, the dumb money often assumes that powerful entrenched interests colluded against them to deny them their long-deserved free ride to prosperity through speculation. The exchanges are in cahoots with the other side. Well, no, the exchanges have two interests, which are solvency and transaction volume, which drives their profits. Solvency is a more primary goal for an exchange, because the second goal can’t exist without it, and exchanges are not thickly capitalized."

    ReplyDelete
  173. Gary,

    >okay I'll ask the question again. The one that
    >nobody seems to be able to answer.
    >What possible reason does the government or
    >the Fed have for trying to manipulate the price
    >of gold?

    I think there are good reasons for them to do so, and plenty of people have answered that question. I also have no doubts that you apparently don't find any of those answers convincing. However, that is very different from there not being any valid answers.

    Also, that you don't find those answers convincing doesn't mean the Fed/Govt/Banks would find them unconvincing too. They may see a validity where you don't. And if they do -regardless of whether they're right or wrong in seeing it- why wouldn't they act on it?

    ReplyDelete
  174. Walter,

    "...if the Fed/Govt/Banks would consider it to fit their purposes to do so?"

    Isn't Fed=Banks, since it's private organization?

    ReplyDelete
  175. silver chart should look like oil in 2008..> $20

    ReplyDelete
  176. Gary, a you sharpening your pencils? We are getting close to 1578... :-)

    ReplyDelete
  177. Wow, we could test 1600 before this cycle ends. Incredible strength!

    ReplyDelete
  178. Impressive silver move too, reminds me of silver's pre crash moves!

    ReplyDelete
  179. Gary, there's 1580. Should we really add here?!

    ReplyDelete
  180. Gary

    My "its a trap"comment a few days ago was aimed at the manipulation, running the stops and other games that big money play. The Good news is I added minutes after the update and before the "Gary pop". I figured I would beat the rush. Glad i did.

    Thx

    ReplyDelete
  181. Flaunt,
    You do realize that that collapse was going to happen no matter what right?

    Yes the margin increases probably condensed the decline to five days instead of five weeks but it was still going to happen.

    The simple fact is that parabolic moves are not sustainable.

    ReplyDelete
  182. Gary,

    then do you expect a gold margin increase comming here?

    ReplyDelete
  183. Silver shorts will get their heads handed to them, even if it underperforms gold. Waiting for $20 silver is a mistake, this is not 2008.

    Miners remain the place to be, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  184. DP,

    >Isn't Fed=Banks, since it's private organization?

    As far as I know, formally the Fed is owned by the large banks. However, I'd say that +for all practical purposes+ the Fed is ultimately government controlled.
    I don't think that discussion is very relevant, though.
    Far more important is the more-encompassing phenomena of regulatory capture, of which the Fed=Banks? issue is just a spin-off.

    ReplyDelete
  185. RE:Gold price manipulation. The Fed wants a higher gold price. If gold doesn't go higher, investors will question if there really is any devaluation of the dollar (inflation) and hold on to cash since there are so many obvious problems with the economy. The higher gold price is a clear sign the dollar is being hit and that cash is a bad idea, so people buy stuff.. presumably making the economy stronger.. of course it backfires at this stage in the game.

    ReplyDelete

Please see the link below to comment on the new blog.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.